|
Recent interest in issuing preferred stock originated as a managerial issue the company faced in 2002.
Financial fundamentals of the company was in very delicate situation in 2002. In order to improve this, the company shifted to a cash-flow management, and for financial strengthening for the foreseeable future, issued preferred stock to the extent of \106 billion by means of a debt equity swap.
More recently, the emphasis on cash-flow management has paid off and the company has steadily improved its financial fundamentals. This has encouraged the company to prevent dilution of ordinary shares in the future, as might be caused by the preferred stock, and starting in August 2005 began cancellation of the preferred stock.
After that, a new medium-term business plan, Plan for Vision (PFV), intended to further enhance the corporate value, went into effect in April 2006. It is believed that cancellation of the preferred stock earlier than had been anticipated will help the company attain the objectives of this plan.
What we have done regarding the preferred stock since 2002 is represented by the diagram below.
*DES:Debt Equity Swap

| Management's Challenge in 2002 |

|
 |
| Management's Challenge in 2005 |

| Because conversion of preferred stock into ordinary shares would roughly triple the number of outstanding shares, prevention of such a dilution, and protection of the rights of ordinary-share owners, was seen as a managerial challenge in 2005, as was the raising of the corporate value. |
Number of ordinary shares after conversion of preferred stock *1
|
Total issued price
(\ billion) |
Converted to ordinary shares
(1,000 shares) |
| Class I |
26.5 |
126,787 *2 |
| Class II |
26.5 |
126,787 *2 |
| Class III |
26.5 |
126,787 *2 |
| Class IV |
26.5 |
126,787 *2 |
| Total |
106 |
507,146 *2 |
*1 Number of ordinary shares outstanding as of this time: 244,166,000.
*2 Round off numbers |
Securing the funds for cancellation of preferred stock
|
| The medium-term business plan for 2003-05 resulted in increases for both sales and profits, and equity was greatly improved. |
| Result |

|


|
 |
| Approach |

| By canceling, on three occasions, Class IV, III, and II, 70% of the entire issue was cancelled. |
Achievements and Plans for Cancellation of Preferred Stock
|
Timing of
cancellation |
Book value |
Resources
for cancellation |
| Class IV
Preferred Stock |
August 2005 |
\22.5 billion |
Reserves |
| Class III
Preferred Stock |
March 2006 |
\26.5 billion |
Public offering |
| Class II
Preferred Stock |
August 2006
(Plan) |
\22.5 billion |
Reserves |
| Total |
|
\71.5 billion |
- |
|

Effects in terms of preventing a dilution of ordinary shares
|
Effects in terms of preventing a dilution of ordinary shares |
| Class IV
Preferred Stock |
107,650,000 shares |
| Class III
Preferred Stock |
126,787,000 shares |
| Class II
Preferred Stock |
107,650,000 shares |
| Total |
342,087,000 shares
(equivalent to 111.6% of ordinary shares outstanding) |
|
Reduction of dividend payment obligations
|
Dividend obligations |
| Class IV
Preferred Stock |
\498 million |
| Class III
Preferred Stock |
\518 million |
| Class II
Preferred Stock |
\367 million |
| Total |
\1,383 million |
|
|
 |
| Management's Challenge from 2006 on |

|
 |
| Approach |

 |



When Nissan Motor sold 13% of its shares to Volvo in March 2006, Volvo became a major shareholder. This relationship has encouraged us to consider a synergistic collaboration with Volvo. At the present time, we are exploring the potential of working together in a broad range of areas, and are confident that certain items that can be realized within a short term will contribute to achieving the objectives of our medium-term business plan, PFV. Furthermore, Volvo acquired 6% of UD Trucks's shares held by Nissan Motor Co.,Ltd. on September 28,2006.As a result of this acquisition, Volvo hold 19% of UD Trucks's shares.
Synergy with Volvo
1.Products:
|
Both companies plan to execute co-works to develop suitable and competitive product in global markets, and at the same time try to maximize product commonization including complementation of power-train components and parts. |
2.R&D:
|
Making up collaborations scheme mainly in the area of efficient fuel consumption, safety and IT. |
3.Production:
|
Ensuring manufacturing competitiveness globally through the evaluation of each performance. |
4.Distribution:
|
Making up sales collaboration scheme globally by enhancing both strengths in the market. |
5.Purchasing:
|
Trying to receive the full benefit from volume effect. |
Continuation of the Nissan Motor relationship
|
Relations with Nissan Motor will be continued, with an emphasis on light-duty trucks and diesel engines. |
|
|
|